Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
I get it now. So it's sort of a contest. The more people who follow
you, the more visibility you get, and the more valuable you are to advertisers. It makes sense, but I just don't like that system.
It's a holdover from newspapers, TV, radio, etc.  They offer the media for "free" and sell the eyeballs to companies for advertisement to pay for it all.  But that model is falling apart.
It fell apart for newspapers long ago.  I stopped listening to TV and radio long ago, so I don't have a feel for how they are funding things anymore.
Online, too many people have workable ad blockers.  Then there's the whole bot problem that inflates eyeball count.
Add into that the saying "If the service is free, YOU are the product." and people don't want their private information sold to others.
I think that we are moving toward a pay-for-play set up now on the Internet.  No more free services (or free, but you are very restricted).
I appreciate you explaining all this. You're great at explaining things
in a straightforward way. But doesn't it seem wrong for a great person like Megyn Kelly to have to pay to be heard?
The alternative is a bunch of fakes claiming to be Megyn Kelly wanting you to hear them.
This is the same discussion we had a while back when email spam was getting really bad.  People floated an idea to charge people per email.  Like 5 cents.  For the average person, that's about $1/month.  But for a spammer, that's a big chunk of profit loss.
... Windows speed tip: type DEL \WINDOWS\*.*
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
 * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)