This seems to be the one thing I've never seen here since I got back.. a fidonet.na
Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper descriptions of each echo/fileecho?
Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper descriptions of each echo/fileecho?
Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper
descriptions of each echo/fileecho?
The ones out there are not exactly accurate and many echoes dead and gone.
On 31 May 24 10:01:26, Jim Howarth said the following to All:
Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper descriptions of each echo/fileecho?
The ones out there are not exactly accurate and many echoes dead and
gone.
Nick
--- Renegade vY2Ka2
* Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)
I thought the .na meant never available :)
Sysop: | Saxainden |
---|---|
Location: | Littleton, CO |
Users: | 56 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 15:02:43 |
Calls: | 875 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 43 |
Messages: | 43,803 |