Starship point-to-point: a potential future application or a capability flex?
Date:
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 21:39:11 +0000
Description:
Officially announced by SpaceX as a future goal of Starship, Point-to-Point  proposes utilizing its rapidly The post Starship point-to-point: a potential  future application or a capability flex? appeared first on 
NASASpaceFlight.com .
FULL STORY ======================================================================
Officially announced by SpaceX as a future goal of Starship, Point-to-Point  proposes utilizing its rapidly reusable Starship launch vehicle as an  Earth-focused fast transportation system, allowing people to travel anywhere  in the world in under one hour. 
While the capability is undeniably exciting and futuristic, its viability  remains questionable due to the numerous technical and regulatory challenges,  as well as the economics of what would certainly be an expensive system  compared to traditional transportation methods. 
 
Point-to-Point was revealed during one of Elon Musks earlier Starship  presentations, when Starship was known as the BFR (Big Falcon Rocket).  Although six years have passed since the official announcement, SpaceX  President Gwynne Shotwell mentioned it again during interviews following the  announcement , saying that Point-to-Point would be available within a decade  six years ago. Furthermore, Point-to-Point remains part of the Starship  overview on the SpaceX website. 
At the time of the reveal, which was part of an overview of Starships bigger  goal of making life multiplanetary with its Mars missions, the idea was met  with a mix of excitement and skepticism. It proposed a future where Starship  could break the transit time constraints of air travel, providing a flight to  anywhere in the world in under an hour, and some of the main flagship routes,  such as London to New York, in under 30 minutes. 
 
That, at least, was the rockets flight time. It did not include details or  timings regarding the boarding and egress process, which, according to the  presentation, would involve a transit on a speedboat to the launch and 
landing platform. However, proponents claim airlines only advertise their  actual flight time. 
Futuristic proposals involving rockets transporting passengers across the  planet have been embedded in past proposals but often dismissed as 
far-fetched and not cited as the primary reason for utilizing a rocket. 
One such example was Lockheed Martins VentureStar, a fully reusable  single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) vehicle concept, primarily designed as a  futuristic complement to the Space Shuttle Program and a challenger to medium  lift launch vehicles by vastly reducing the cost of launch services. Concept  showing VentureStar launhing from an airport. (Credit: NASA/Lockheed Martin) 
While it was in its X-33 development phase, a subscale technology version of  the VentureStar, it was designed as a cargo-dedicated vehicle, but noted  future aspirations to incorporate a crewed version centered around its 
payload area. Future use materials showed VentureStar launching from an  airport with passengers reading newspapers while waiting for their flights on  the vehicle. 
One since-lost marketing video, from Lockheed Martins Skunkworks facility 
that was building the X-33, cited that passengers could launch from 
California and land in New York in minutes. 
However, this version of Point-to-Point was never expanded on, as the X-33 
was soon canceled following major development issues with its unique 
composite propellant tanks. 
Domestic Point-to-Point within the U.S. removes some of the major issues  Starships version could encounter. It has previously gained some interest 
from Sir Richard Branson , although he, too, cited global transportation as  the goal, despite Virgin Galactic operating in the suborbital realm. A bit of  an Easter Egg from Richard Branson. Talking about a global network of  spaceports, trans-continental supersonic space flights, delivering passengers  anywhere on the world within a couple of hours. pic.twitter.com/WBZ6xvsfPO 
 NSF  NASASpaceflight.com (@NASASpaceflight) May 10, 2019 
 
 In the great story of commercial aviation, (there will be) a chapter that  will see Spaceport America become linked with a global network of spaceports,  noted Branson at a Spaceport America event. Virgin Galactic (could be)  operating transcontinental supersonic spaceflights, delivering passengers  anywhere on the planet. 
It was no surprise that SpaceXs proposal gained the greatest attention, not  least because Elon Musk revealed it at a major Starship presentation. Since  then, Musk has not spoken about it with the vigor he presents for Starships  other capabilities, such as building permanent bases on the Moon and Mars. 
However, SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell promoted the residual capability of  Starship during a TED interview in 2018, which also debated some of the  challenges the company would face. 
 
 Basically, what were going to do is fly BFR like an aircraft and do  point-to-point travel on Earth. So you can take off from New York City or  Vancouver and fly halfway across the globe, noted Shotwell. Youll be on the  BFR for roughly half an hour or 40 minutes. The longest part of that flight 
is actually the boat out and back (to the platform). 
SpaceX is no stranger to ocean-based platforms, having previously acquired 
two oil rigs and named them Phobos and Deimos. The company worked on the  platforms briefly but would ultimately sell them. 
 
For point-to-point to work, SpaceX will have to meet the stringent  requirements and restrictions surrounding launching and landing near major  population centers. While Falcon 9 boosters return to both ocean-based  droneships and land-based landing zones, the latter are located within  relatively remote launch centers in Florida and California  several miles 
away from any major cities or towns. 
SpaceX has already demonstrated its ability to land Super Heavy boosters at  its Starbase launch site in Texas, for which the company went to great 
lengths to warn locals of the sonic booms during the vehicles return  despite  a large exclusion zone where the nearest population center is around eight  kilometers away. 
However, for a regular point-to-point launch and landing platform to be  located near a major city, local regulations, including FAA-level noise  restrictions, could result in the platform being placed tens, if not 
hundreds, of kilometers off the coast. Such a distance would further increase  travel times to and from the platform via boat. The potential location of a  Starship point-to-point platform off the coast of New York City. (Credit:  Google Earth) 
Interestingly, Shotwell doesnt believe the requirements for the launch and  landing platforms will be that restrictive  expecting the platforms to be  located 5-10 km off the coast. 
Were bringing the (Falcon) first stages back, and were landing them on 
federal property, on an Air Force base. So I think doing it, I dont know, ten  kilometers out from a city, maybe its only five kilometers out from a city 
(is possible). 
The logistics and costs of resupplying the ocean platform, servicing the  rocket both before launch and after landing, and transporting passengers to  and from the pad also affect the viability of the economics of 
point-to-point. Economics, even with a customer base of the super-rich 
looking to fly transatlantic a few hours less than usual, failed to save  Concorde. Space Shuttle Enterprise and Concorde in the early 80s. (Credit:  Paris Air Show) 
 Even with the economic game changer of a fully reusable launch vehicle, the  costs of propellants alone for such a large rocket will play into the price 
of tickets. 
Everyone thinks rockets are really expensive, and to a large degree, they 
are, and how could we possibly compete with airline tickets here? Shotwell  said. But if you think about it, if I can do this trip in half an hour to an  hour, I can do dozens of these a day, right? And yet, a long-haul aircraft 
can only make one of those flights a day. 
 See Also SpaceX Starship Program L2 SpaceX Section NSF Store Click here to  Join L2 
So even if my rocket was slightly more expensive and the fuel is a little bit  more expensive, I can run 10x at least what theyre running in a day and 
really make the revenue that I need to out of that system. 
On the plus side, there wont be a lack of rich commuters looking to fly on a  rocket, although they will be riding on an actual rocket that comes with the  G-forces such an experience would entail. That may rule out some of those  willing passengers. 
As mentioned, on the timescale of point-to-point becoming a reality, Shotwell  noted, within a decade for sure, six years ago. Such timelines are never set  in stone, with Starship, like most other rockets, being delayed many years  from its projected milestones. SpaceX has also often noted it will take many  hundreds of Starship launches before humans are cleared to fly on it. 
As such, it is hard to see commuters riding on a point-to-point flight within  the next two decades. Fortunately, however, point-to-point is not restricted  to commuter travel. The concept has already garnered interest from the U.S.  Air Force, specifically the Air Force Research Laboratory, for transporting  cargo around the world. Starship-like vehicle delivering cargo, presumably  after a point-to-point flight. (Credit: U.S. Air Force) 
While the economic viability of point-to-point transportation for the U.S. 
Air Force is questionable, when the military adapts to logistics  transportation in a timely manner, as seen with the C-17, it will likely be  worth spending time and money exploring other options, such as Starship. 
While cargo point-to-point removes several concerns associated with a  commercial passenger system that would be burdened with regulations, the  military would still need to cater to flying rockets to other parts of the  world outside of a warzone scenario. 
Thus far, SpaceX has only shared information regarding point-to-point on  Earth. However, one potential future option for point-to-points ultimate  viable use may ironically not be on Earth. 
SpaceX aspires to build large, self-sustaining cities on Mars, which recently  received attention during Elon Musks recent presentation on SpaceXs latest  plans for making life multiplanetary. Notably, although not expanded on, one  slide noted the goal of a global mobility, potentially laying the foundations  for a point-to-point system on Mars. Elon Musk presenting SpaceXs latest 
plans for Mars. (Credit: SpaceX) 
Many of the potential roadblocks for this system on Mars would be mitigated  compared to Earth, such as territorial, noise, and safety impacts on large  population centers. 
While still an official goal of SpaceX, the transportation of commercial  passengers on Earth via Starship is likely to be the final leg of any  realization of this project. Military and off-world potential remains its 
most realistic potential. 
 (Lead image: SpaceX render of Starship performing a point-to-point flight.  Credit: SpaceX) 
 
The post Starship point-to-point: a potential future application or a  capability flex? appeared first on NASASpaceFlight.com .
======================================================================
Link to news story: 
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2025/06/point-to-point-2025/
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 (Linux/64)
 * Origin: tqwNet Science News (1337:1/100)