• Re^2: Still there?

    From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Nicholas Boel on Wed Apr 10 09:56:38 2024
    Hi Nicholas,

    On 2024-04-09 17:51:30, you wrote to me:

    Someone correct me, but doesn't Mystic BBS still allow you to
    program things in Pascal?

    I highly doubt Mystic has a Pascal compiler build into it. So it
    probably has support for executables. So it doesn't matter what language
    they are written in.

    For the record, Mystic uses MPL (Mystic Programming Language) which is heavily
    based on, if not identical to Free Pascal, iirc. There is indeed a compiler
    included with the BBS software, called 'mplc' (Mystic Programming Language Compiler, I would assume).

    So yes, you can write and compile your own stuff. ;)

    Thanks for the info! I learned something today. ;-)


    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.0-B20240409
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Dr. What@1:342/200 to Wilfred van Velzen on Wed Apr 10 05:38:44 2024
    Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Dr. What <=-

    Hi Dr.,
    (Your real name is broken!)

    No. My real name is fine. The sysop of this BBS has his echos configured incorrectly.

    That's an opinion! ;)

    I liked Turbo C ...

    Yup. That's an opinion. But good luck finding a good C compiler for CP/M 2.2.

    Back in those days development was
    1. Edit the code in your favorite editor (probably Wordstar).
    2. Exit the editor and run pass 1 of your compiler.
    3. If that worked, run pass 2 of the compiler.
    4. If that worked, run the linker.
    5. And if that worked, run your executable to see what you need to fix.
    6. Goto 1.

    Needless to say, Turbo Pascal was wonderful in those days. Turbo C didn't come out until MUCH later.

    I highly doubt Mystic has a Pascal compiler build into it. So it
    probably has support for executables. So it doesn't matter what
    language they are written in.

    No, that's not correct. I don't know if it has a compiler "built in", but I know that you wrote your code and use some sort of "compiler" to build it. It's been a while.

    I have Python seen being mentioned in the Mystic area...

    As have I. So that's why I'm wondering.

    And how many languages have riffed off Java?

    I think you are confused with C !

    No. C was old by then. C++ was the rage. Hence the move to Java.

    Newer languages borrow good thing from the current languages and try to leave the bad things behind.


    ... You have the right to remain silent.... USE IT!
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Dr. What on Wed Apr 10 15:30:14 2024
    Hi Dr.,

    On 2024-04-10 05:38:44, you wrote to me:

    (Your real name is broken!)

    No. My real name is fine. The sysop of this BBS has his echos configured incorrectly.

    You can't blame it all on the sysop. You could sign your messages with your realname.

    That's an opinion! ;)

    I liked Turbo C ...

    Yup. That's an opinion. But good luck finding a good C compiler for CP/M 2.2.

    I don't know anything about CP/M. ;)

    Needless to say, Turbo Pascal was wonderful in those days. Turbo C
    didn't come out until MUCH later.

    Then you must be really old! ;-)

    I started (professionally) with Turbo C on the PC under DOS, I think on a 386...

    I highly doubt Mystic has a Pascal compiler build into it. So it
    probably has support for executables. So it doesn't matter what
    language they are written in.

    No, that's not correct. I don't know if it has a compiler "built in", but I
    know that you wrote your code and use some sort of "compiler" to build it. It's been a while.

    Nicholas Boel explained it...


    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.0-B20240409
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Tim Schattkowsky@2:240/1120.29 to Dan Clough on Tue Apr 9 10:46:20 2024
    //Hello Dan,//

    on *08.04.24* at *16:26:00* You wrote in Area *PASCAL*
    to *Tim Schattkowsky* about *"Re: Still there?"*.

    Tim Schattkowsky wrote to All <=-

    Hello All,

    Ping!

    Pong!

    Not too much going on here ;)

    Regards,
    Tim

    --- WinPoint 415.0
    * Origin: Original WinPoint Origin! (2:240/1120.29)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Tim Schattkowsky on Tue Apr 9 11:28:26 2024
    Hi Tim,

    On 2024-04-09 10:46:21, you wrote to Dan Clough:

    Not too much going on here ;)

    Who, in their right mind, is still using Pascal, if they can avoid it? ;-)

    In Fidonet there are a few legacy programs that were written in Pascal. But of those I don't think there are many that are actively maintained.


    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.0-B20240408
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Dr. What@1:342/200 to Wilfred van Velzen on Tue Apr 9 05:21:46 2024
    Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Tim Schattkowsky <=-

    Who, in their right mind, is still using Pascal, if they can avoid it? ;-)

    Those of who are playing with vintage CP/M and MS-DOS machines. Turbo Pascal was probably the best tool for programming on those systems.

    In Fidonet there are a few legacy programs that were written in Pascal. But of those I don't think there are many that are actively maintained.

    Someone correct me, but doesn't Mystic BBS still allow you to program things in Pascal? Or did they finally move to Python?

    But the ghosts of these old languages still exist in the modern ones. Pascal wouldn't have existed without Algol. Java borrows heavily from Pascal. And how many languages have riffed off Java?


    ... You've obviously been educated beyond your intelligence.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)
  • From Mike@1:229/310 to Dr. What on Tue Apr 9 08:11:16 2024
    Someone correct me, but doesn't Mystic BBS still allow you to program things in Pascal? Or did they finally move to Python?

    I think you're right. Somebody else is welcome to comment.

    Unless it's now Free Pascal?

    ... Youth is glorious, but it isn't a career

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Clutch BBS * telnet://clutchbbs.com (1:229/310)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Dr. What on Tue Apr 9 15:48:02 2024
    Hi Dr.,

    (Your real name is broken!)

    On 2024-04-09 05:21:47, you wrote to me:

    Who, in their right mind, is still using Pascal, if they can avoid
    it? ;-)

    Those of who are playing with vintage CP/M and MS-DOS machines. Turbo Pascal
    was probably the best tool for programming on those systems.

    That's an opinion! ;)

    I liked Turbo C ...

    In Fidonet there are a few legacy programs that were written in
    Pascal. But of those I don't think there are many that are actively
    maintained.

    Someone correct me, but doesn't Mystic BBS still allow you to program things
    in Pascal?

    I highly doubt Mystic has a Pascal compiler build into it. So it probably has support for executables. So it doesn't matter what language they are written in.

    Or did they finally move to Python?

    I have Python seen being mentioned in the Mystic area...

    But the ghosts of these old languages still exist in the modern ones. Pascal
    wouldn't have existed without Algol. Java borrows heavily from Pascal.

    I think Java much more looks like C(++)!

    And how many languages have riffed off Java?

    I think you are confused with C !


    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.0-B20240408
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Carlos Navarro@2:341/234.12 to Wilfred van Velzen on Tue Apr 9 17:31:30 2024
    Hello, Wilfred van Velzen.
    On 9/4/24 11:28 you wrote:

    In Fidonet there are a few legacy programs that were written in
    Pascal. But of those I don't think there are many that are
    actively maintained.

    D'Bridge, Mystic (I believe), Winpoint (if we consider Delphi as Pascal)...

    --
    Carlos
    --- Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
    * Origin: cyberiada (2:341/234.12)
  • From Rob Swindell@1:103/705 to Dr. What on Tue Apr 9 15:20:50 2024
    Re: Re: Re^2: Still there?
    By: Dr. What to Wilfred van Velzen on Tue Apr 09 2024 05:21 am

    Someone correct me, but doesn't Mystic BBS still allow you to program things in Pascal? Or did they finally move to Python?

    And Mystic itself is written in Pascal. <shrug>
    --
    digital man (rob)

    Rush quote #61:
    He's a rebel and a runner, he's a signal turning green .. New World Man
    Norco, CA WX: 79.5øF, 18.0% humidity, 3 mph NW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Nicholas Boel@1:154/10 to Wilfred van Velzen on Tue Apr 9 17:51:30 2024
    On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 20:48:02 +0200, you wrote:

    Someone correct me, but doesn't Mystic BBS still allow you to program things
    in Pascal?

    I highly doubt Mystic has a Pascal compiler build into it. So it probably has
    support for executables. So it doesn't matter what language they are written in.

    For the record, Mystic uses MPL (Mystic Programming Language) which is heavily based on, if not identical to Free Pascal, iirc. There is indeed a compiler included with the BBS software, called 'mplc' (Mystic Programming Language Compiler, I would assume).

    So yes, you can write and compile your own stuff. ;)

    Regards,
    Nick

    ... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb
    * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)