• fidonet.na

    From Jim Howarth@1:229/300 to All on Fri May 31 10:01:26 2024
    This seems to be the one thing I've never seen here since I got back.. a fidonet.na

    Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper descriptions of each echo/fileecho?

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: NerdRage BBS -.- telnet: nerdragebbs.ddns.net (1:229/300)
  • From Nicholas Boel@1:154/10 to Jim Howarth on Fri May 31 14:53:18 2024
    On Fri, 31 May 2024 15:01:26 -0400, Jim Howarth -> All wrote:

    This seems to be the one thing I've never seen here since I got back.. a fidonet.na

    The last one I have in my file echos is from May 15, 2019. So I'd assume whoever was doing it either gave up on it, or their system is on autopilot and broke.

    Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper descriptions of each echo/fileecho?

    Someone used to, but I think the only time a new .NA was released if a new echo was added or removed.

    Either way, if you're just looking for an up to date listing with all the descriptions, I've made the copy I have available at:

    https://pharcyde.org/backbone.na

    Regards,
    Nick

    ... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb
    * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
  • From Atreyu@1:229/426 to Jim Howarth on Tue Jun 4 15:43:32 2024
    On 31 May 24 10:01:26, Jim Howarth said the following to All:

    Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper descriptions of each echo/fileecho?

    The ones out there are not exactly accurate and many echoes dead and gone.

    Nick

    --- Renegade vY2Ka2
    * Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)
  • From Nicholas Boel@1:154/10 to Atreyu on Tue Jun 4 20:19:48 2024
    On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:43:32 GMT, Atreyu -> Jim Howarth wrote:

    Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper
    descriptions of each echo/fileecho?

    The ones out there are not exactly accurate and many echoes dead and gone.

    Looks like he's using Mystic, and is posting to the Z1C echo, so one can assume (as I did) he is having Mystic auto-add them upon import. So hopefully he just needs a list of actual descriptions to match up with those echotags.

    What I sent should be enough to cover most english based, mostly dead to somewhat active echos, but he'll definitely have to dig deeper if he wants to head over to non-english speaking echos, or the ones that have been dead for years already. :)

    Regards,
    Nick

    ... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb
    * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
  • From Nigel Reed@1:124/5016 to All on Wed Jun 26 19:54:50 2024
    On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:43:33 +0000
    "Atreyu" (1:229/426) <Atreyu@f426.n229.z1.fidonet> wrote:

    On 31 May 24 10:01:26, Jim Howarth said the following to All:

    Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper descriptions of each echo/fileecho?

    The ones out there are not exactly accurate and many echoes dead and
    gone.

    Nick

    --- Renegade vY2Ka2
    * Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)

    I thought the .na meant never available :)
    --
    End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
    telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016)
  • From Atreyu@1:229/426 to Nigel Reed on Thu Jun 27 03:51:26 2024
    On 26 Jun 24 19:54:51, Nigel Reed said the following to All:

    I thought the .na meant never available :)

    Bahahahaha

    Atreyu

    --- Renegade vY2Ka2
    * Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)