• Sniffing out smell: How the brain organi

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Thu Jul 2 21:35:30 2020
    Sniffing out smell: How the brain organizes information about odors


    Date:
    July 2, 2020
    Source:
    Harvard Medical School
    Summary:
    Neuroscientists describe for the first time how relationships
    between different odors are encoded in the brain. The findings
    suggest a mechanism that may explain why individuals have common
    but highly personalized experiences with smell, and inform efforts
    better understand how the brain transforms information about odor
    chemistry into the perception of smell.



    FULL STORY ========================================================================== [Brain with inscription | Credit: (c) iushakovsky / stock.adobe.com]
    Brain with inscription smell (stock image).

    Credit: (c) iushakovsky / stock.adobe.com [Brain with inscription |
    Credit: (c) iushakovsky / stock.adobe.com] Brain with inscription smell
    (stock image).

    Credit: (c) iushakovsky / stock.adobe.com Close The premiere of the
    movie Scent of Mystery in 1960 marked a singular event in the annals
    of cinema: the first, and last, motion picture debut "in glorious Smell-O-Vision." Hoping to wow moviegoers with a dynamic olfactory
    experience alongside the familiar spectacles of sight and sound, select theaters were outfitted with a Rube Goldberg-esque device that piped
    different scents directly to seats.


    ========================================================================== Audiences and critics quickly concluded that the experience stunk. Fraught
    with technical issues, Smell-O-Vision was panned and became a running
    gag that holds a unique place in entertainment history. The flop of Smell-O-Vision, however, failed to deter entrepreneurs from continuing
    to chase the dream of delivering smells to consumers, particularly in
    recent years, through digital scent technologies.

    Such efforts have generated news headlines but scant success, due in part
    to a limited understanding of how the brain translates odor chemistry
    into perceptions of smell -- a phenomenon that in many ways remains
    opaque to scientists.

    A study by neurobiologists at Harvard Medical School now provides new
    insights into the mystery of scent. Reporting in Nature on July 1,
    the researchers describe for the first time how relationships between
    different odors are encoded in the olfactory cortex, the region of brain responsible for processing smell.

    By delivering odors with carefully selected molecular structures and
    analyzing neural activity in awake mice, the team showed that neuronal representations of smell in the cortex reflect chemical similarities
    between odors, thus enabling scents to be placed into categories by
    the brain. Moreover, these representations can be rewired by sensory experiences.

    The findings suggest a neurobiological mechanism that may explain why individuals have common but highly personalized experiences with smell.



    ==========================================================================
    "All of us share a common frame of reference with smells. You and I both
    think lemon and lime smell similar and agree that they smell different
    from pizza, but until now, we didn't know how the brain organizes that
    kind of information," said senior study author Sandeep Robert Datta,
    associate professor of neurobiology in the Blavatnik Institute at HMS.

    The results open new avenues of study to better understand how the brain transforms information about odor chemistry into the perception of smell.

    "This is the first demonstration of how the olfactory cortex encodes information about the very thing that it's responsible for, which is
    odor chemistry, the fundamental sensory cues of olfaction," Datta said.

    Computing odor The sense of smell allows animals to identify the chemical nature of the world around them. Sensory neurons in the nose detect
    odor molecules and relay signals to the olfactory bulb, a structure
    in the forebrain where initial odor processing occurs. The olfactory
    bulb primarily transmits information to the piriform cortex, the main
    structure of the olfactory cortex, for more comprehensive processing.



    ========================================================================== Unlike light or sound, stimuli easily controlled by tweaking
    characteristics such as frequency and wavelength, it is difficult to
    probe how the brain builds neural representations of the small molecules
    that transmit odor. Often, subtle chemical changes -- a few carbon atoms
    here or oxygen atoms there -- can lead to significant differences in
    smell perception.

    Datta, along with study first author Stan Pashkovski, research fellow in neurobiology at HMS, and colleagues approached this challenge by focusing
    on the question of how the brain identifies related but distinct odors.

    "The fact that we all think a lemon and lime smell similar means that
    their chemical makeup must somehow evoke similar or related neural representations in our brains," Datta said.

    To investigate, the researchers developed an approach to quantitatively
    compare odor chemicals analogous to how differences in wavelength,
    for example, can be used to quantitatively compare colors of light.

    They used machine learning to look at thousands of chemical structures
    known to have odors and analyzed thousands of different features for each structure, such as the number of atoms, molecular weight, electrochemical properties and more. Together, these data allowed the researchers to systematically compute how similar or different any odor was relative
    to another.

    From this library, the team designed three sets of odors: a set with
    high diversity; one with intermediate diversity, with odors divided into related clusters; and one of low diversity, where structures varied only
    by incremental increases in carbon-chain length.

    They then exposed mice to various combinations of odors from the different
    sets and used multiphoton microscopy to image patterns of neural activity
    in the piriform cortex and olfactory bulb.

    Smell prediction The experiments revealed that similarities in odor
    chemistry were mirrored by similarities in neural activity. Related
    odors produced correlated neuronal patterns in both the piriform cortex
    and olfactory bulb, as measured by overlaps in neuron activity. Weakly
    related odors, by contrast, produced weakly related activity patterns.

    In the cortex, related odors led to more strongly clustered patterns
    of neural activity compared with patterns in the olfactory bulb. This observation held true across individual mice. Cortical representations
    of odor relationships were so well-correlated that they could be used to predict the identity of a held-out odor in one mouse based on measurements
    made in a different mouse.

    Additional analyses identified a diverse array of chemical features,
    such as molecular weight and certain electrochemical properties, that
    were linked to patterns of neural activity. Information gleaned from
    these features was robust enough to predict cortical responses to an
    odor in one animal based on experiments with a separate set of odors in
    a different animal.

    The researchers also found that these neural representations were
    flexible.

    Mice were repeatedly given a mixture of two odors, and over time, the corresponding neural patterns of these odors in the cortex became more
    strongly correlated. This occurred even when the two odors had dissimilar chemical structures.

    The ability of the cortex to adapt was generated in part by networks
    of neurons that selectively reshape odor relationships. When the normal activity of these networks was blocked, the cortex encoded smells more
    like the olfactory bulb.

    "We presented two odors as if they're from the same source and observed
    that the brain can rearrange itself to reflect passive olfactory
    experiences," Datta said.

    Part of the reason why things like lemon and lime smell alike, he added,
    is likely because animals of the same species have similar genomes and therefore similarities in smell perception. But each individual has personalized perceptions as well.

    "The plasticity of the cortex may help explain why smell is on one hand invariant between individuals, and yet customizable depending on our
    unique experiences," Datta said.

    Together, the results of the study demonstrate for the first time how the
    brain encodes relationships between odors. In comparison to the relatively well- understood visual and auditory cortices, it is still unclear how
    the olfactory cortex converts information about odor chemistry into the perception of smell.

    Identifying how the olfactory cortex maps similar odors now provides
    new insights that inform efforts to understand and potentially control
    the sense of smell, according to the authors.

    "We don't fully understand how chemistries translate to perception yet,"
    Datta said. "There's no computer algorithm or machine that will take
    a chemical structure and tell us what that chemical will smell like."
    "To actually build that machine and to be able to someday create a controllable, virtual olfactory world for a person, we need to understand
    how the brain encodes information about smells," Datta said. "We hope
    our findings are a step down that path." Additional authors on the study include Giuliano Iurilli, David Brann, Daniel Chicharro, Kristen Drummey,
    Kevin Franks and Stefano Panzeri.

    The study was supported by the Vallee Foundation, the National Institutes
    of Health (RO11DC016222, U19NS112953) and the Simons Collaboration on
    the Global Brain.


    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Harvard_Medical_School. Original
    written by Kevin Jiang.

    Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Stan L. Pashkovski, Giuliano Iurilli, David Brann, Daniel Chicharro,
    Kristen Drummey, Kevin Franks, Stefano Panzeri, Sandeep Robert
    Datta.

    Structure and flexibility in cortical representations of odour
    space.

    Nature, 2020; DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2451-1 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200702144119.htm

    --- up 23 weeks, 2 days, 2 hours, 39 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)